Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 02.07.2025 04:04

Let’s just make it real clear:
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Just in the last 5 years:
Archer Aviation Stock Tumbles: Here’s What This Investor Predicts Next - TipRanks
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Chinese Biotech Showcases Challenger to Eli Lilly’s Obesity Drug - Bloomberg.com
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
What are the cities in England, UK that have trams?
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
The big, bad bond market could derail Trump’s big, beautiful bill - vox.com
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Russia can stop this any time.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
What is an appropriate response to someone saying "merci" in French?
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Thank you.
Clint Eastwood Shades Era of Remakes: Do Something New or Stay at Home - Variety
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
What are some cool confidence hacks?
What’s next?
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Weed may be bad for your heart, whether you smoke or consume edibles - Live Science
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.